Town and County residents who had concerns and questions about the Buck Creek fire got some answers on June 26 at a meeting at Buck Creek Hall.
The meeting was organized by Brazeau County and had all county councillors present, as well as members from the Drayton Valley Brazeau County Fire Services, representatives from the Alberta Emergency Management Agency (AEMA), the Drayton Valley RCMP, Town Mayor Nancy Dodds, and some town councillors.
Kent Edney, the chief administrative officer for Brazeau County, chaired the meeting. Using a powerpoint presentation, Edney gave a breakdown of the fire relief efforts and costs. He also used the presentation as an opportunity to address common questions the County has been receiving.
To help put things into perspective, Edney showed the classification of the fire. According to the AEMA, the fire was classified as a type 1 incident, which is the most complex type of incident that can occur. It typically requires national and sometimes international aid to address.
The fire itself was classified as Level 6 Head fire based on the Head Fire Intensity Scale, which is the most dangerous fire situation on a scale of one to six.
“So, you can see that even a trained firefighter isn’t going to run in front of that fire. They’re going to have to fight it from the back and the flanks,” says Edney.
Brazeau County Reeve Bart Guyon pointed out that the incident in Brazeau County sits in the same classification as other well-known natural disasters, like Hurricane Katrina.
“The complexity of responding to this fire was that same complexity of response for Hurricane Katrina,” said Edney.
However, at the time of the fire, there were 105 other wildfires in the province, and Edney said the Buck Creek fire didn’t make the top of the list of the most urgent.
“There were times when we were asking for 200 firefighters, but we only got 30,” said Edney of the first few days of the fire. The reality was that the resources in the province were spread thin.
Edney said there is a four-inch thick emergency manual they have to follow when something like this happens. This manual includes a very detailed command structure that has to be in place to help prevent confusion and misinformation.
Everyone fighting the fire only had one person to answer to at any given time. That person they reported to only had one person to report to, and this went all the way up to the Incident Commander.
In the system, no more than seven people answered directly to the commander. And each of those people only had seven people answering to them, all the way down to the boots-on-the-ground firefighters.
This command structure included the RCMP, fire department, Town, County, and eventually other groups who came in to offer aid. All directions came from one person to ensure there was a consistent effort.
Edney also gave a breakdown of the statistics of the event. In total, there were more than 12,000 acres affected by the fire, which had a perimeter of 48.1 km. He says there were five residences lost to the fire, but there were zero casualties. There were only two known injuries during the entire firefighting effort.
The presentation also contained an hour-by-hour breakdown of the firefighting efforts from May 3 to May 6. In 24 hours, the fire went from the North Saskatchewan River to the Rex Block subdivision on Range Road 80.
While Edney was open to receiving constructive criticism from residents, he did point out to residents one positive that the County did have. During the evacuation, the County permitted people to enter back into the area to feed cattle, pick up medication, and other important items.
“That’s not something you normally do. That’s not standard. That’s not done anywhere else,” says Edney.
In most cases, people are not allowed back into the area for any reason. But the County wanted to do its best to help people keep their day-to-day lives going as much as possible.
He says the situation devolved into people wanting to go back in for favourite articles of clothing or other unimportant matters. With the lack of resources and the danger of the fire, he said it was frustrating that people were bothering responders with those kinds of requests.
And even though they were allowing people back in if the situation was urgent, there were still other people who were aggressive and angry if they were turned away due to unreasonable requests. In one case, a truck drove through a barricade, putting those manning the post in serious danger.
During the question period, many residents expressed concern and disappointment because they felt the fire department was negligent in staying on top of the original fire.
Fire Chief Tom Thomson addressed these concerns by giving a detailed list of their daily activities surrounding the fire from April 23 to May 3. Thomson says that even though there were nine other wildland fires during that time period, and the department was responding to other emergencies like car accidents, the fire was still being checked on daily.
Thomson says there were firefighters out on the scene of that fire every day from April 23 until May 4, when the fire took off. Cherpin also explained that he was out there on May 3, flagging lines for dozer guards that were put into place that evening.
“Just so everyone is aware, we were there the whole week. We were committed, we were involved, and we were extinguishing the fire,” says Thomson.
The main problem with the fire, says Thomson, was that it was in the peat moss. Fires that go underground in peat moss don’t have smoke, there is no heat, and there is no flame.
“The fire burns underground. You cannot see it, you cannot feel it, you cannot smell it. It just pops up and away it goes,” says Thomson.
One area of concern for residents was the amount of communication received from the County. Edney explained to people that it was important to understand the difference between needing information and wanting information.
“You need to know that it’s not safe. You need to know to stay evacuated,” said Edney.
He says many people wanted to know how many firefighters were out fighting, where they were working, and which residences were in danger. However, with the limited resources available for fighting the fire, every phone call asking about those things was using those resources.
Edney admitted that the communications needed work and was open to suggestions from residents about how they could improve. He gave an example of fires that are out of control and under control, using pictures to illustrate. He says he could have clarified how those statuses worked and what they meant.
However, he says as it was, even with the recent downpour of rain, the fire was only now being labeled as under control instead of just being held.
Residents also wanted to know why they couldn’t just sign a waiver form and go in to fight the fire.
Edney explained that a waiver isn’t any good if the County or department were negligent in any way. He says if Joey Cherpin, the Director of Emergency Management, were to give someone permission to go fight the fire and that person died, it would be Cherpin who would go to jail.
He says that even though residents wanted to step in and help, no one felt comfortable taking on the personal liability of giving an untrained volunteer permission to fight the fire.
And while the County wouldn’t authorize volunteers to go in and deal with the fire, there were still some residents who took it upon themselves to help. As a result, there were some incidents where lives were in danger because someone was creating fireguards in an area where firefighters were working to put out hotspots.
Another question put forth by residents was in regard to the dozer guards and the damages they caused.
Edney, Guyon, and Cherpin said there would be remediation taking place for those areas where the firefighting efforts caused damage to property.
However, any property that received damage directly from the fire would have to go through personal insurance. That included fences that had been burned down.
Cherpin also explained that some of the dozer guards put into place were not authorized by the fire department. In fact, there is a dozer guard that runs behind Poplar Ridge and up north toward 621 for several kilometers that were completely unnecessary, and they have no idea who did it.
Guyon and Edney both explained that while the County did not create those guards, they would be covering the expenses to remediate those areas as well.
“There are a lot of things that were done by well-meaning people thinking they were helping… that’s now the County’s responsibility to fix,” said Edney.
Edney and Guyon said the County was in the process of applying for grants from the province to help pay for the remediation costs. Edney says it’s important for residents to take accurate measurements of damaged areas and lots of pictures because when they apply for the grants, they cannot have estimated numbers.
“It comes down to something as simple as you served 540 meals that day, but there were only 512 people signed in, so why were there extra meals?” says Edney.
